The impact of risk aversion and ambiguity aversion on annuity and saving choices
نویسندگان
چکیده
Abstract We analyze the impact of risk aversion and ambiguity on competing demands for annuities bequeathable savings using a lifecycle recursive utility model. Our main finding is that have similar effects: an increase in either two reduces annuity demand enhances bond holdings. obtain this unequivocal result flexible intertemporal framework Hayashi Miao (2011) by assuming agent’s preferences are monotone with respect to first-order stochastic dominance. contribution then twofold. First, from decision-theoretic point view, we show monotonicity allows one clear-cut results about respective roles aversion. Second, insurance our decreases stands contrast what usually found other products. As such, it may help explain low annuitization level observed data.
منابع مشابه
Does ambiguity aversion reinforce risk aversion? Applications to portfolio choices and asset prices
It is often suggested that ambiguity aversion makes individuals more precautionary, thereby offering a potential explanation for the equity premium puzzle. We show that this is not true in general. We consider a model in which risk-and-ambiguity-averse agents can invest in an unambiguously safe asset and in an ambiguous risky asset. We exhibit some sufficient conditions to guarantee that, ceter...
متن کامل“the effect of risk aversion on the demand for life insurance: the case of iranian life insurance market”
abstract: about 60% of total premium of insurance industry is pertained?to life policies in the world; while the life insurance total premium in iran is less than 6% of total premium in insurance industry in 2008 (sigma, no 3/2009). among the reasons that discourage the life insurance industry is the problem of adverse selection. adverse selection theory describes a situation where the inf...
15 صفحه اولGender Differences in Risk Aversion and Ambiguity Aversion
Gender Differences in Risk Aversion and Ambiguity Aversion This paper demonstrates gender differences in risk aversion and ambiguity aversion. It also contributes to a growing literature relating economic preference parameters to psychological measures by asking whether variations in preference parameters among persons, and in particular across genders, can be accounted for by differences in pe...
متن کاملAmbiguity and Ambiguity Aversion
Consider the following choice problem, known as “Ellsberg’s three-color urn example”, or simply the “Ellsberg Paradox” (Ellsberg [7]). An urn contains 30 red balls, and 60 green and blue balls, in unspecified proportions; subjects are asked to compare (i) a bet on a red draw vs. a bet on a green draw, and (ii) a bet on a red or blue draw vs. a bet on a green or blue draw. If the subject wins a ...
متن کاملInequality aversion and risk aversion
This note shows that for two inequality averse social welfare functions, if one is more inequality averse than the other, the household preference induced by optimally allocating aggregate bundles according to this social welfare function is more risk averse than the other. We present examples showing that this comparative static can be reversed if inequality aversion is dropped. We show that t...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Journal of Risk and Uncertainty
سال: 2022
ISSN: ['0895-5646', '1573-0476']
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11166-022-09386-9